![]() |
Central America’s Rule of Law: Guatemala Captures Portillo But Honduras Rewards Micheletti
January 28, 2010
by Daniel AltschulerFor decades, impunity has reined in
Since the Peace Accords brought
Not only have Guatemalan voters lost faith in democratic government’s ability to bring economic development and alleviate massive poverty, but vast swaths of the citizenry have come to believe that the laws simply do not apply to the powerful. As the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) has shown, perceptions of corruption and insecurity negatively affect democratic values in Guatemala. Compared with other Latin American countries, it is unsurprising that
Since the Peace Accords, two international institutions in particular have worked to support the rule of law in
Second, the apprehension of ex-President Portillo could send a strong signal that Guatemalan authorities will target even political elites. Portillo, who became president as the standard-bearer of Efraín Ríos Montt’s—who took power via a coup in the 1982 and led much of the state-sponsored genocide—FRG, oversaw an era of rampant corruption in Guatemalan politics. This week, after avoiding simultaneous raids at four different houses, authorities captured Portillo as he allegedly sought to flee to Belize (Portillo had twice in the past avoided attempts for his capture). He now faces the prospect of extradition to the U.S., where he faces federal charges of money laundering. Of course, Portillo’s conviction is far from being a fait accompli. His capture, however, augurs well for the rule of the law in
Meanwhile, neighboring
This week, it has become clear that no one will face prosecution for ousting Honduran President Manuel Zelaya. Earlier this month, the Honduran Supreme Court began proceedings against military officials responsible for removing President Zelaya from the country (not for removing Zelaya from power, deemed legal by the Court and the Congress). Predictably, the president of the pro-Micheletti Supreme Court, Jorge Rivera Avilez, dismissed these charges on Tuesday. And, while prosecutors said they would appeal the decision, Porfirio Lobo’s declaration last week that he would offer amnesty to all involved in the coup (in addition to safe passage out of the country for Manuel Zelaya) confirmed these suspicions. The Congress will approve this measure today, to coincide with Lobo’s inauguration.
To make matters worse, the Honduran Congress declared two weeks ago that it would grant Roberto Micheletti a congressional salary-for-life in honor of what they deemed his defense of Honduran democracy and sovereignty since June 28, 2009. This reward for Micheletti—which followed the Congress’s landslide vote rejecting Zelaya’s proposed reinstatement in December—has added insult to injury for defenders of the rule of law in
This has been a month of highs and lows for the rule of law in
*Daniel Altschuler is a contributing blogger to americasquarterly.org conducting research in
Tags:: Alfonso Portillo, Álvaro Colom, Amnesty, Central America, CICIG, Guatemala, Honduras, Impunity, Manuel Zelaya, MINUGUA, Porfirio Lobo, Roberto Micheletti, Rodrigo Rosenberg, Rule of Law
To read more from Americas Quarterly, sign up for a free trial issue of the print magazine. No risk, no commitment.
To speak with an expert on this topic, please contact the communications office at: communications@as-coa.org or (212) 277-8384.











I really wish for change..
Most Guatemalans lost faith in democratic government's ability to bring economic development and alleviate massive poverty. People still hope for security from the government, because for Guatemalans perceptions of corruption still reflect in the government. This promotes a negative outlook to democratic values in Guatemala. Compared with other Latin American countries, it is not surprising that Guatemala ranks low in popular preference for democracy as a form of government. For a long time impunity has reined in Central American countries like coups, murder, and have gone unpunished. Now ex-President Afonso Portollioo is arrested for money laundering $70 million when he was in power, I really wish this would be the start of hope for this country.
I'm not sure what
I'm not sure what kind of rewards system that is.
Background Check
I really like your blog content, I’ve read the topic with great interest.
In Australia the word
In Australia the word "lawyer" is used to refer to both barristers and solicitors (whether in private practice or practising as corporate in-house counsel).
How can a federal immigration
How can a federal immigration law enforced by a state be racist in and of itself?
still confused about $70 million
I keep trying to post this question, but it does not seem to show up. I thank you for your explanation, but wondering if you can answer a larger question about this column. Forgive my ignorance about the rules of blogging, but you stated that all your writing is based on months of field research. Yet, you said the $70 million comes from the Guatemalan papers and, it appears, beyond that you're not too sure. I'd just like to know what I'm reading. Is this commentary on the news in Guatemala or is this original research, reporting and analysis? If it's the latter, I'd really like you to look at the $70 million figure. I think it paints the Portillo case inaccurately. I also think that for you to respond by saying "if you have information, bring it to the newspapers" shows that you're not very concerned with the voracity of the information you use.
Please address this.
Thank you.
$70 million?
Just out of curiosity, where do you get the figure $70 million? I think that is incorrect.
Re: $70 Million
Hi Tom75,
The Guatemalan media has consistently cited the $70 dollar figure as the amount in question. See, for instance, today's Prensa Libre: http://www.prensalibre.com/noticias/Mexico-avala-extradicion_0_220178042.html. If you have evidence that this is wrong, I'd be interested to see it and I encourage you to contact newspapers such as the Prensa Libre (Guatemala's de facto newspaper of record) and El Periodico.
Thanks for reading,
Daniel Altschuler
follow up
Thank you for the explanation, but I still have some confusion about this blog. Forgive me, I'm not familiar with the rules of blogging, etc... But in a reply to another comment, you said all your writing comes from months of field work, so I assume that it's original reporting. But you said the $70 million number comes from the Prensa Libre and El Peiodico and it doesn't seem that you know where they come up with that number. I'd just like some clarification about the nature of these columns. Are they original reporting, as you stated, or are you translating the words of Guatemalan journalists and adding some opinion?
I tried to post this question, but I can't find it. I hope it's not being deleted because this is a sincere question to which I'd very much appreciate an answer.
Thank you.
I'm confused
Thanks for the response, but I'm just a bit confused about the nature of your blog. You just commented that your writing is based on meticulous research, yet you cite El Periodico and Prensa Libre -- both of which are wrong as often as they are right, by the way -- as your source for the $70 million. Should you not base your writing on primary sources when available -- such as in this case? Forgive my confusion on the rules of blogging, but I just want to be know that I can trust the information.
Thank you.
Can you handle the truth?
How far removed are you from reality in Honduras by writing so much nonsense. First of all, is easy to write essays from a distance in the comfort of the University of Oxford. Manuel Zelaya was no saint and he did not have good intentions towards his country since he was willing to give away his homeland and put it in the hands of populist dictator Hugo Chavez. For several months (do your research) Mr. Zelaya held private meetings with members of Honduran institutions and the US Ambassador Hugo Llorens and was warned to stop his intention of conducting illegal surveys to change the Honduran Constitution to stay in power indefinitely. This so called "Coup" did not happen overnight. On the contrary, Mr. Zelaya's erratic behavior and endangerment of the already weak democracy in Honduras forced all institutions to have to use infamous force at the end to stop this mad leader. Unfortunately, dialogue was not something Mr. Zelaya like other leaders in Latin America are willing to use for debate and reasoning. Although Mr. Zelaya goes on temporary exile all charges of corruption against him have been dropped and let me tell you that this man left his own country BANKRUPT. And finally, let's be honest with one another; it is not new that the United States is the one who decides at the end who is a fugitive of the law and who is not. Does it sound familiar: Noriega, Pinochet, and the list goes on and on...
Ad hominem attacks
Hi 'Hs',
I appreciate that you took the time to respond to the article. I find it unfortunate, though, that you resort to ad hominem attacks. The idea that I've been writing this and other articles from the comfort of Oxford is simply false. Everything I write is based on many months of fieldwork in Central America. I'm quite happy to have a discussion about the merits of a particular argument, but your response smacks of the closed-minded, ideological reactions that have plagued the debate on Honduras since (and before) June 28, 2009.
Thanks for reading,
Daniel Altschuler