![]() |
BABY STEPS ON US Policy in CUBA; COLOMBIA AND THE SUMMIT
February 26, 2009
by Liz HarperThis week, two small steps for U.S. policy on Cuba.
First up: Sen. Richard Lugar’s new report, “Changing Cuba Policy-In the United States National Interest.” In short, it calls the existing policies ineffective, finding major reform in the United States’ best national (and economic) interests.
The recent leadership changes in Washington and Havana have created an opportunity to “reevaluate a complex relationship marked by misunderstanding, suspicion and open hostility,” Sen. Lugar wrote in his letter to fellow senators.
Several traditional realists, like Pedro Burelli, a former member of the PDVSA—Venezuela’s state oil company—board of directors have applauded this report’s recommendations as pragmatic, rather than “coming from the perspective of the teary-eyed leftist camp.”
And, the report, I’m told, has largely received positive feedback.
Not everyone offers kudos. Adolfo Franco, former assistant administrator for Latin America and the Caribbean at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), raised several concerns, including that the report “makes no mention of representative democracy as being our paramount policy goal for Cuba and the entire region.”
But, as Franco and others noted, Sen. Lugar has said this stuff for nearly a decade now. Seemed to be the appropriate time though to say it again. Especially since Secretary of State Hillary Clinton promised a thorough review of Cuba policy.
Second small development: Congress takes up a huge spending bill from last year containing several provisions that would de-fund the enforcement of restrictions imposed by then-President Bush in 2004 on family travel and remittances to Cuba.
The House approved this omnibus bill on Wednesday, and the Senate is expected to do the same next week.
Not much of protest from Congress, except from Florida Sen. Mel Martinez who threatened to block the bill.
So what’s up with the timing of these developments, and why so quiet?
Franco cautioned that the Democratic majority was trying to change policy under the radar, especially as Congress is focused on domestic economic issues. Franco said, “I do hope we can have a meaningful debate [of any proposed changes] in Congress” and that it would be taken up in the press. Yeah, no kidding!
Sarah Stephens, executive director of the Center for Democracy in the Americas emailed in:
“Nobody is trying to sneak anything new through anywhere. In fact, it isn't really bold enough for where the issue is now, for where policymakers and others are.”
And where are they? Stephens notes: “There is widespread consensus that the policy has failed, consensus that is growing every day. There have been congressional majorities voting for change for years; plus, everybody from the Cuban American National Foundation to the Cuba Study Group to Freedom House to Senator Lugar is saying it's time, now, to change policy.”
Meanwhile, one long-time House staffer lamented that there was a sense of resignation and no way to stop the coming changes to U.S. policy—a combination of farm state lobbyists and liberals in Congress see this as their time. Of course, there are still those who will fight to the bitter end.
Some also believe President Obama is taking Congress’ pulse on Cuba, so he can get a sense of how far the administration can go initially or later.
That initial move is expected to come shortly before the Summit of the Americas in April with an executive order fulfilling a campaign promise to repeal restrictions on travel and remittances for Cuban-Americans. (A recommendation of the Lugar report.)
There’s expected to be more movement in Congress in the coming months…including a bill allowing travel for all Americans.
Now on a different note: A reception hosted by Colombian Ambassador Carolina Barco to recognize the influence of African culture in Colombia.
The stunning feature: Grupo Bahia, five talented and energetic musicians playing the marimba, guasa, bombo, cununos and the sax.
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell and his wife, Alma Powell, Colombian Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos, Colombian Minister of Culture Paula Moreno Zapata, and Colombia’s Foreign Minister Jaime Bermúdez Merizalde—as well as some soon-to-be administration officials—attended.
But, even here, the hot topic of conversation was Cuba. Well, that, and of course, the Colombia free trade agreement, as well as a planned Hollywood movie about the dramatic FARC hostage release. Who would play Santos in the film? Harrison Ford, perhaps?
The Colombian ministers were in town this week along with several other dignitaries from the Western Hemisphere as preparations ramp up for the Summit of the Americas. Celso Amorim, Brazilian Minister of Foreign Relations also met with Secretary Clinton and other officials on Wednesday—ahead of President Lula da Silva’s visits to New York and Washington, DC next month.
And, speaking of preparations for the summit—stay tuned for the official announcement of a certain former career foreign service officer (Ambassador Jeffrey Davidow) to be named special envoy to the summit. Any day now…
Tags:: Castro, Cuba, USTo read more from Americas Quarterly, sign up for a free trial issue of the print magazine. No risk, no commitment.
To speak with an expert on this topic, please contact the communications office at: communications@as-coa.org or (212) 277-8384.











Some also believe President
Some also believe President Obama is taking Congress’ pulse on Cuba, so he can get a sense of how far the administration can go initially or later. Thanks for making people aware of this.
I for one have never
I for one have never understood how a pc pitstop promo code might cause difficulties for the health concerns of the US, but I can see how that might be true for discount promo code systems in general. Should greater public awareness of fatcow promo code occur, the working cless will be the first to draw similarities with gay.com promo code. One only hopes that the pc tools promo code is not dragged into the whole affair.
US CUBA relations
In April 2009 U.S. President Barack Obama began implementing a less strict policy towards Cuba. The U.S. president had stated that he is open to dialogue with Cuba, but that he would only lift the trade embargo if Cuba has political change. In March 2009, Obama signed into law a Congressional spending bill which eased some economic sanctions on Cuba and eased travel restrictions on Cuban Americans (defined as persons with a relative "who is no more than three generations removed from that person")[41] traveling to Cuba. The April executive-branch changes further removed time limits on Cuban American travel to the island. As quoted from Wikipedia
Cuba Eye Opening
It is a very interesting article and has made me more aware of the current situation between Cuba and the USA. Thanks for the article.
Thinking about it ...
Thinking about it, what it may reflect is the lack of presidential attention. In each of the cases above, President Obama has personally anointed his envoy, secretary or expert. On Cuba, Obama has been relatively silent since the election. That is certainly understandable, since this economic crisis would make any president want to keep all foreign policy issues off the front burner for as long as possible, Cuba even more so. In the absence of Presidential attention, the bureaucracies will eventually take over.
Do you think with a Democrat
Do you think with a Democrat govt in place US policy will change?
I hope Obama will bring us a
I hope Obama will bring us a better era because as of now, the market is slowly diminishing and millions are losing jobs.
Cuba
There are no regular ferries or boats to Cuba from foreign ports, although some cruise liners do visit.Most ports are closed and tourists are not permitted to walk around them. Private vessels may enter at Marina Hemingway in Havana or Marina Acua in Varadero. There are no visa requirements. Expect to hand out several $10 bills to facilitate your entry.
US policy Towords Cuba
NAFSA: Association of International Educators issued a statement this morning about President Obama's decision to reverse restrictions on family travel and remittances to Cuba what were imposed by the Bush administration. However, President Obama did not change policy on academic travel to Cuba and it is this part of the U.S. policy towards Cuba that NAFSA's statement is focused on. The following snippet is a cut and paste from part of the NAFSA statement that I want to highlight:
"We now urge the administration to move quickly to rescind the rest of the restrictions on communications with Cuba that were imposed by the Bush administration—restrictions on educational travel. At a minimum, the Obama administration should restore the situation to where it was before the Bush administration: Americans should be able to study in Cuba and participate in educational travel to the island, and Cuban scholars should be permitted to attend academic conferences in the United States."
web design new york
This is a dynamic development
This is a dynamic development with regards to Cuba and US relations. These two neighbors have already been at odds for so long. I think it's time to mend fences for the harmony in the region. Rick
He needs to do something more
He needs to do something more than this absolutely essential humanitarian step because of the expectation by the other participants that the US end its unilateral embargo.
indoor tanning lotion - sunbed tanning - tanning bulbs - tanning bed lotion
Citizen demands for greater
Citizen demands for greater security parallel an unprecedented rise in crime. In 2007, reported crimes reached the highest level yet, with 2,668 incidents for every 100,000 inhabitants. In fact, since the early 1990s, reported property crime has almost tripled, and personal crime, such as theft, assaults and robbery, has grown twofold. To its credit, Chile is the only Latin American country where law enforcement institutions are generally trusted and praised for professionalism. A May 2008 survey by several Chilean think tanks reports that 57 percent of the population trusts the Chilean national police—the highest level of any institution
Regards,
ACTDE
Thank you for information you
Thank you for information you have provided here. Please keep it up and I will come back again.
Well yeah these were really
Well yeah these were really crucial leadership changes lets see how they take it !
Full color printing
prom
prom hairstyles updos
To most Americans, the idea
To most Americans, the idea that our country is attacking Islam or that we view the Islamic faith as an enemy is absurd. The first Gulf War was a response to Saddam Hussein’s invasion of a neighboring Arab country. On 9/11, America was the victim, not the aggressor. In Iraq, President Bush’s rationale for regime change, though misguided, was hardly anti-Islamic. U.S. leaders can’t be held accountable for what some writers say in order to scare people and sell books. What is more, in the 1990s, America twice led NATO into conflicts on behalf of Muslim populations — first in Bosnia, then Kosovo.
change
I agree with Stevens. This "baby step" is not nearly bold enough for the times we are in. The embargo is not assuring human rights in Cuba, it is giving Havana and excuse not to improve them. Now is the time. Where is the change? http://talkingcuba.wordpress.com/
Bigger Steps Necessary on Cuba
President Obama will have little credibility if all he brings to the Summit of the Americas is travel for Cuban Americans.
He needs to do something more than this absolutely essential humanitarian step because of the expectation by the other participants that the US end its unilateral embargo.
An easy step up would be to authorize general licenses for eleven other categories of people to people non-tourist travel, including educational, religious, humanitarian, cultural, and sports.
www.ipetitions.com/petition/obamacuba