btn_subscribe-top
btn_give-a-gift
btn_login
btn_signup
btn_rss

Blog

Political Upheaval in Honduras: Elections will Help, but Not Cure the Problem

July 23, 2009

by Altschuler-Corrales

Authors: Daniel Altschuler and Javier Corrales

Despite the recent military coup against Manuel Zelaya, Hondurans will most likely elect their next president by the end of 2009. This might end the crisis that led to the coup. But elections will not fix all of Honduras’ political ills. Honduras must also address the decline in the quality of democracy that predates the current crisis, or else it will remain dangerously susceptible to more breakdowns.

Comment on this post

On the surface, Honduras prior to this crisis appeared to have moved steadily toward strengthening democracy. From 1982 to 2008, Honduras held seven consecutive civilian elections followed by uninterrupted presidential terms. Honduras also seemed to have tamed its military by the mid-1990s, as civilian leaders had reined in military spending and the military’s political veto power.

The current crisis in Honduras is a stark reminder that democracy entails more than free and fair elections and a military that answers to civilian authority—crucial as these may be. Democracies must also expand the rule of law, citizens’ access to the justice system, state guarantees of civil and political rights, and protections for political minorities. These added aspects of democracy help democracy deliver positive development outcomes and ensure citizens’ political satisfaction. In Honduras, these added aspects were faltering prior to the recent constitutional crisis.

The immediate cause of the June coup was clearly the inability of democratic institutions to rein in a president who was violating the law. The military compounded the problem by expelling the president. But the longer-term problem was a decline in the quality of democracy, which was hampering the political system’s ability to protect citizens and spread prosperity. Poverty remains rampant, corruption pervasive, and crime has gotten worse. In addition, inequality in this vastly unequal society increased during several years in the last decade. And in surveys we have conducted in rural areas, people often report feeling abandoned by an incapable or absent state.

Honduras’ low quality of democracy has produced disenchantment. Data compiled by the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) in 2008 shows that less than half of Honduras’ population expressed confidence in the Congress, the judiciary, or the Presidency. Tellingly, Hondurans reported greater trust in the military than in any other national political institution. In terms of state legitimacy and citizens’ political tolerance, Honduras ranked last after Haiti.

Political behavior has changed, as well.
Honduran voters used to go to the polls, virtually without fail, to vote for one of the two dominant right-of-center parties. In recent elections, turnout dropped along with party identification. Discontent with the two dominant political parties was rising, but no clear alternative was emerging. The political system was becoming a rudderless ship. Because of these trends in attitudes and behaviors, LAPOP went as far as to dub Honduras in 2008 as a ‘democracy at-risk’, a claim that now appears prescient.

This precarious pre-coup situation suggests that Honduran democracy may not be immune to future threats, even if the current crisis eases. As with humans and viruses, all democracies in developing countries are susceptible to a wide array of potential assaults: overzealous presidents, drug lords capturing the state, corrupt politicians in congress, executive-legislative deadlock, and ruling parties in disarray. But democracies with low quality institutions are least likely to survive these assaults, let alone resolve them legally. The current crisis may very well abate with the upcoming election, but Honduras, under the best short-term scenario, will still remain vulnerable to future viral attacks.

Daniel Altschuler is a Rhodes Scholar and doctoral candidate in Politics at the University of Oxford. Javier Corrales is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. They are studying civic participation in Honduras.

Tags:: democracy, Elections, Honduras, Manuel Zelaya

To read more from Americas Quarterly, sign up for a free trial issue of the print magazine. No risk, no commitment.

To speak with an expert on this topic, please contact the communications office at: communications@as-coa.org or (212) 277-8384.
blog comments powered by Disqus

There was NO coup!

What coup? There was NO coup, except in the propaganda coming from Castro/Chavez and parroted by much of the mainstream media.

Zelaya committed serious crimes and violated the Honduran constitution, so the country's Supreme Court ordered the military to remove Zelaya. As per the Honduran constitution, Micheletti was appointed interim president as the person next in line. This is Constitutional Democracy in action combating illegal behavior by a sitting President.

Millions of Venezuelans, Nicaraguans, Bolivians, Ecuadorians, etc. wish we could have done what Hondurans are doing before the Marxist thugs working for Castro and Chavez enslaved our countries like Zelaya is trying to enslave Honduras.

Zelaya was implementing in Honduras the scheme devised by Castro and implemented by Chavez and the rest of the Marxist thugs to gain absolute power.

We pray Hondurans are able to defend themselves from Chavez, Zelaya and Obama, who are lying, manipulating and intimidating to force Hondurans to get infected with the AIDS of Marxism.

Government

How about some suggestions from the authors as to changes that should be implemented to maje the government more democratic?


 
 
Subscribe

AQ BLOGGERS REPORT FROM

Bogotá, Colombia
   Jenny Manrique
   Andres Mejia Vergnaud
   Lorenzo Morales

 

Buenos Aires, Argentina
   Janie Hulse Najenson

 

Guatemala City, Guatemala
   Kara Andrade
   Nic Wirtz

 

Houston, Texas
   Joshua Ryan Rosales

 

La Paz, Bolivia
   Cecilia Lanza

 

Lima, Peru
   Sabrina Karim

 

Monterrey, Mexico
   Arjan Shahani

 

Montreal, Canada
   John Parisella

 

New York, NY
   Daniel Altschuler
   Jason Marczak
   Christopher Sabatini

 

Ottawa, Canada
   Huguette Young

 

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
   Taylor Barnes

 

Salvador, Brazil
   Paulo Rogério

 

San José, Costa Rica
   Steve Mack

 

San Salvador, El Salvador
   Julio Rank Wright

 

Washington, DC
   Eric Farnsworth
   Liz Harper
   Kezia McKeague

 

Follow AQ on

Heros of Social Inclusion
Issues in Depth

2012 U.S. Elections: Follow AQ coverage of U.S. presidential candidates' positions on issues affecting the Americas. Updated May 4, 2012.


On AQ's Social Inclusion Portal

May 4: Read about Brazil's historic court ruling to legalize racial quotas in the federal university system.
Plus, read more on public and private efforts that promote inclusion and economic growth.

» Go to the Portal.

NOW ON AS/COA ONLINE

Loading...

AQ MEDIA PARTNERS